21 Reasons We Need Population Stabilization in 2021

2020—the most abysmal year in recent memory—has finally come to an end. Now that we’re onto a new year with a new presidential administration, a new Congress, and a new COVID-19 vaccine, we can set our sights on brighter days (although this week’s sedition attempt was certainly a rough start to what was meant to be a hopeful turning of the page). One of the outcomes of this new government that we’re sure to see is a renewed commitment to programs that will help achieve population stabilization.

President-elect Biden has pledged to repeal the Global Gag Rule and the Domestic Gag Rule and resume funding to UNFPA as soon as he takes office later this month. He has also indicated that he’ll work with Congress to repeal the Helms and Hyde Amendments, although, realistically speaking, we’ll likely be stuck with these terrible policies for a while longer, until we gain a larger pro-choice majority in Congress.

As we welcome 2021 and bask in optimism for the first time in four years, here’s a list of 21 global challenges population stabilization would help resolve. Try to think of another single achievement that would solve so many other problems—if you come up with one, please let me know.

  1. Biodiversity Loss and Species Extinction
    • The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) identified human population growth as a primary extinction threat posed to about 1 million plant and animal species in its 2019 Global Assessment Report. We’re crowding out the planet’s wildlife, and once it’s gone, it’s gone for good.
  2. Zoonoses
    • Why are humans an extinction threat to so many species? Because we destroy wildlife habitats to expand agricultural land, we poach protected species, and our activities change the climate in ways that threaten animals’ survival. Another consequence of habitat encroachment, poaching, and climate change? Zoonotic viruses such as SARS-CoV-2 (which causes COVID-19) jumping to humans. Other viruses that have jumped from wildlife to humans have caused diseases including HIV, SARS, Lyme, Ebola, and Bird Flu.
  3. Climate Change
    • The IPCC bases its future carbon emissions projections on various assumptions of future population size and socioeconomic development. That’s because the number of people there are on earth—and how much each of us consumes—determines how many gigatons of climate changing carbon emissions we release into the atmosphere.
  4. Ocean Acidification
  5. Deforestation
    • Another human-induced contributor to climate change is deforestation. According to World Resources Institute, tropical deforestation accounts for about 8 percent of current carbon emissions, but halting deforestation and allowing decimated forests to regrow could “provide 23 percent of the cost-effective climate mitigation needed before 2030.” Deforestation occurs because we clear forests for agricultural land and because we use timber for cooking fuel and building material. More people = more demand for food, fuel, and housing. And, as mentioned above, destroying wildlife habitat brings us into contact with animals that may carry zoonotic diseases and puts plant and animal species at risk of extinction.
  6. Desertification
  7. Air Pollution
  8. Overfishing
    • As mentioned above, the main source of protein for billions of people around the world is seafood. With a global population that grows by 80 million people a year, the number of seafood consumers is rising year after year as well, which increasingly means that oceans are being fished too aggressively for sea life to reproduce fast enough to replenish stocks. In 2015, one-third of marine fish stocks were being harvested at unsustainable levels.
  9. Meat Production
    • Population growth and increasing affluence in middle-income countries (which, as a group, make up three-quarters of the world’s population), are causing meat consumption to rise. Meat provides people with protein, but its production is the leading cause of methane in the atmosphere—a much more potent greenhouse gas than carbon—and contributes to soil erosion, water pollution, and freshwater use, which is a concern in water-stressed areas. Of course, there are also ethical issues surrounding the breeding, raising, and killing of livestock.
  10. Food Security
  11. Fresh Water Security
  12. Sanitation
  13. Natural Disaster Vulnerability
    • Natural disasters that occur in densely populated areas—especially where buildings aren’t constructed to withstand earthquakes, hurricanes, flooding, etc.—cause more widespread devastation and higher death tolls than those that occur in less densely populated areas. Low-elevation coastal zones—mostly located in developing regions—are rapidly growing, exposing ever more people to sea-level rise, tsunamis, and tropical storms.
  14. Women’s Empowerment
    • As long as women must spend their reproductive decades bearing and rearing children, high fertility will prevent countries from achieving gender equity. When girls can’t finish their educations because of early childbearing and when mothers can’t work outside of the home because of childcare obligations, women’s empowerment will remain an unreachable goal. Women must be able to decide for themselves whether, when, and with whom to have children in order to take control of their lives and compete with men in society, in the labor force, and for political office.
  15. Maternal Mortality
  16. Infant and Child Mortality
    • Every year, 3 million children under age 5 die of mostly preventable causes. Nearly half of these deaths (2.5 million) occur in the first month of life; another 1.5 million occur in the following 11 months; and 1.3 million deaths occur in children ages 1−4. Not surprisingly, under-5 mortality is highest in sub-Saharan Africa (78 deaths per 1,000 live births, compared with 6 deaths per 1,000 live births in Northern America)—the region with the highest fertility. Infant and child mortality rates are declining, and they would decline even faster with better birth spacing and less early and late childbearing.
  17. Child Marriage
  18. Universal Primary Education
    • The developing world has made great progress in enrolling students in primary school, but there are still places where rapid population growth outpaces countries’ ability to procure school buildings, teachers, and supplies. Most of the world’s out-of-school children live in sub-Saharan Africa, which, again, is the world region with the highest fertility rate. UNESCO wrote in 2015, “a number of sub-Saharan African countries find it difficult to keep up with the rising demand for education from a school-age population that continues to grow,” and, “sub-Saharan Africa is the only region in which the number of out-of-school adolescents has grown, from 21 million in 2000 to 23 million in 2013, a consequence of rapid population growth.”
  19. Peace and Security
  20. Migration
    • When populations grow too quickly for their environments to keep up with resource needs and their governments to keep up with infrastructure maintenance and development, people can be compelled to leave home in order to seek a better life for themselves and their families elsewhere. Push and pull factors vary by individual and by country/region, but common ones include job opportunities, armed conflicts, natural disasters, and environmental degradation.
  21. Social Justice
    • Slower population growth levels the playing field for poor people within countries and for poor countries within our globalized world. Equal opportunity in education, employment, land ownership, and political representation depends on people being able to make their own reproductive choices based on their personal circumstances. Complete reproductive autonomy tends to lead to smaller families and slower population growth because when women can plan each pregnancy, they tend to plan them later in their reproductive years and to space them farther apart.

This list of 21 challenges might seem like a melancholic way to ring in the new year, but I am optimistic that we can address each of them via population stabilization by investing our fair share of $1.74 billion* a year in voluntary international family planning programs. Included in that funding ask is $116 million** for the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). And now that we are less than two weeks away from having a president who respects reproductive choice, we have a chance—for the first time in four years—to get serious and make that investment in the future of the planet and its people.

* This figure was updated on March 11, 2021.
** This figured was updated on March 17, 2021.

14 thoughts on “21 Reasons We Need Population Stabilization in 2021

  1. Overbuilding…we have to keep expanding development boundaries to “provide ” for more demand . We need to be happy with the land we now occupy.

    Transportation…we have to build new roads for more cars, instead of devoting our resources to develop more mass transportation…primarily trains…for long distance.

  2. I couldn’t agree more with all 21 of these items. I’ve been a member of Population Connection since it was Zero Population Growth, and I absolutely believe that mitigating our population worldwide is essential to our quality of life—all life, and even to our survival. I don’t believe population control means controlling people. I believe it can be done by giving women control over their own bodies, access to family planning and birth control, medical care for their children including vaccination, and financial means to support a decent lifestyle. There is a reason I haven’t mentioned men, although they can be a supportive force for families as mine is. Men as a group globally and historically have not proven they are up to the tasks proposed above. They are much too concerned about their image, manhood and progeny, throwing all sorts of control obstacles in the form of religious and political laws in the way of women’s rights. Let’s give women, who are increasingly being allowed to lead in some countries, the chance to solve these problems!

    • Excellent overview of the current human condition, Robin. Thank you. I live in Western New York. Might you live nearby? If so, let’s form a group to promote Population Connection locally.

      All my best wishes. All my relations,

      J. David Swift

    • As a woman, I have to say we need to understand the sociological factors at play. Women are not automatically angels by biology nor are men automatically demons. We are coming out of centuries of abuse of power through the hands of men but that doesn’t mean things will automatically be better just by ignoring men. Many men are coerced into reproduction, especially in countries where women have more power, just as women are coerced when disempowered. Men need to step up and get vasectomies and always use condoms. The responsibility is on their shoulders too. Statistically rich and powerful women have more children than those with medium levels of education and income. What it means that power corrupts and induces many to increase status through childbearing- and this includes women. We have been blinded by patriarchy oppressing women and assume that all will be right if we remove that. Women and men need to be educated TOGETHER, segregation of genders is where imbalance increases. We must educate the youth on population SPECIFICALLY not just general education – which could actually make the problem worse if they see increasing population as positive for economic or other reasons.

  3. Excellent list of the many problems we humans have brought upon ourselves due to failure to control our own population. I wish everyone could read this list.

  4. Please stop supporting GigAg. Do not appoint Tom Vilsac as your secretary of Agriculture. Ban factory farms and high-speed slaughterhouses. Encourage people to adopt the plant-based diet.
    Stop destruction of nature, stop urban sprawl; encourage people not to have more than two children.
    Thank you for your prudence and universal compassion.

  5. Point 21 is very weak on the immigration issue. Every immigrant makes population, much less a needed population reduction, that much more remote. Tell the situation like it really is. We need huge reductions in population nationally and internationally if there is to be anything left for our descendants much less a meaningful existence.

  6. What about the data that says populations will have started to decline by 2100? Or that it has already begun with the lowest population increase being this year? Or the real reason Elites and Governments are worried about population control is because AI is advancing so fast that in 20yrs job availability will be cut in half? Which is their reasoning behind the covid vaccine making your immune system change into sterile? 7 billion vaccinations by 2023 would make the world population about 500 million by 2100.

    • I’m not sure what you’re referring to regarding the COVID-19 vaccine and sterilization, but setting that aside and addressing your first question, we are all for a declining population, as long as such a decline is achieved through progressive, voluntary means. Think about it: Paul Ehrlich wrote his seminal book The Population Bomb in 1968 when the world population was 3.5 billion. In other words, people were already worried about overpopulation when we had less than half the number of people we have today. If our population shrinks, even by 4 billion people, we’ll still be at a level that scientists and activists were concerned about half a century ago.

  7. Your “21 Reasons” are excellent and should be distributed to papers, politicians, and others. Relative to Reason 19, I thought the word “War” should be bolded and Reason 19 moved to Reason 21 or your last reason.

    Other reasons that might be included are:
    (1) increased melting in the North and South Pole.
    (2) Tens of millions of global refugees.
    (3) More people seeking to enter the southern US border due to lack of jobs in Latin America.
    (4) More competition for limited oil reserves, as revealed in recent Greek-Turkish dispute.
    To ignore your 21 reasons is to be anti-science, Mark Bird

  8. The Yale researchers called for ZPG 50 years ago,
    but the other scientists didn’t chime in, because
    they were afraid to “bite the hand that feeds them”
    (they get so much of their bread & butter from
    Government grants). The people weren’t aware of
    what the ZPG’ers were looking at, so they didn’t
    believe anything needed to be done; the politicians
    knew that, so they just kicked the can down the road!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

We Are Population Connection

Since 1968, Population Connection (formerly Zero Population Growth or ZPG) has been America's voice for population stabilization—we are the largest grassroots population organization in the United States! As a 501(c)(3) charity, all donations made to us are tax-deductible.

Already a member? Renew today!

Your tax-deductible membership dues help us advocate for universal access to birth control, educate tomorrow’s leaders about global population challenges, and mobilize Americans who care about stabilizing population. Your on-going support is vital to our continued success!

Renew Today

Stay Updated

Join our Email Action Network to hear about important legislative developments, constituent calls to action, and events in your area!