Letters to the Editor
June 2017

The latest issue of the magazine makes reference to the Hyde Amendment, including this quote: “I don’t care if women have abortions, I just don’t want my tax dollars paying for it.” I have never understood this argument. The practical effect of this policy is to bring unwanted children into this world and likely end up supporting them with public funds for the next 18 years. This makes no economic sense; clearly the cost of an abortion is far less than 18 years worth of welfare payments.

Tom Hawkins
Fort Bragg, California (corrected)

I was glad to see that you mentioned the situation here in Venezuela in your March issue (referencing PLAFAM, the IPPF–WHR organization in Caracas that we have worked with for years).

Although surgical sterilization at the official government currency exchange rate is quite expensive, as you say ($1,500), the black market currency rate for the dollar (which is the de facto rate) brings it down to around $400 at our local clinics here in Cumaná. Still, this is an amount in the local currency that almost no one can afford to pay. The Turimiquire Foundation offers sterilization for the equivalent of about $20 to urban populations, and often for less to struggling rural families. We currently do monthly 30-patient “laparoscopic sterilization days” at local clinics here. We have operated on over 600 women a year for the last few years, but in 2017 our limited funding will cut us back to about 400 procedures. The unmet need is enormous.

In addition, we are the only institution in eastern Venezuela with any significant hormonal contraceptives at all—there are almost no contraceptives of any kind available anywhere locally. We currently supply about 1,500 rural and urban women per month, though we will run out before the end of this year if we are not able to renew our stocks. We work closely with pharmacies and drug wholesalers, but there are almost no contraceptives stocked. We ran out of IUDs and implants early this year with no prospect for replenishing our stocks, nor adequate funding to restock at the current highly inflated pricing. The black market, as you mention, is horrendous.

Soaring unintended pregnancy, especially among adolescents, is just one notable facet of the current Venezuela economic and public health crisis, but it is one with grim long-term consequences. I was very glad to see that you publicized this enormous setback here.

Steven Bloomstein
Turimiquire Foundation
Cumaná, Venezuela

I just read the article on DIY abortion in your March issue. It really does make me mad that while abortion is legal here, it can be unattainable due to the high cost. I am a senior now, and never even considered that as a loyal pro-choice activist.

Roberta Berlin
New Brunswick, New Jersey

One thought on “Letters to the Editor
June 2017

  1. Thank you for your most recent September issue. As a member I find your articles thought provoking. I teach graduate courses in Healthcare Administration and devote multiple discussions to healthcare and the population issue. For example “If healthcare/science does its job and cures or prevents all disease, where will we put all the people?” or “Is overpopulation an unintended consequence of healthcare?”

    I do find some of your contentions short sighted and objectionable. Fore example castigating the entire Congress as “anti-woman zealots” or accusing them of being “cowards, hypocrites, and reprobates” with a broad brush is unlikely to sway any opinions on the issues. We need allies, not enemies. Population control is not a women’s issue only. Men are equally accountable for a better solution for family planning and are ready to be included in the solution. Or to describe the consequences of the “gag rule” as merely being “deadly for women in the poorest parts of the world” leaves out the damage done to families often consisting of men, women and children and excludes us from the solution. These are not “women only” issues. Please be more inclusive in drawing in a larger demographic to the cause. Your use of loose logic to broad brush the issues discredits your persuasiveness to join in.

    God is love
    Love is blind
    Ray Charles is Blind
    So…….Ray Charles is god? Similar to your deductive logic. Please stay focused and inclusive for solutions

    Dr. Steve

Leave a Reply to Stephen Pew Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

We Are Population Connection

Since 1968, Population Connection (formerly Zero Population Growth or ZPG) has been America's voice for population stabilization—we are the largest grassroots population organization in the United States!

Already a member? Renew today!

Your support helps us advocate for universal access to birth control, educate tomorrow’s leaders about global population challenges, and mobilize Americans who care about stabilizing population.

Renew Today

Stay Updated

Join our Email Action Network to hear about important legislative developments, constituent calls to action, and events in your area!